A couple of days ago the quiet country called Bhutan made the jump from hereditary monarchy to a constitutional one (BBC article), holding their very first parliamentary elections. So far the news, while certainly momentous and historical for the Bhutanese, is of very little note. Bhutan is just a little, mountainous, land-locked kingdom with little to distinguish itself (apart from having a kick ass flag). What made me take pause during my news hounding was the reaction of the Bhutanese people. It can be summed up as "Democracy? Why the hell do we need democracy?!". Bhutan seems to be one of those very few countries that were small enough, and fortunate enough, to have a very stable and prosperous monarchy. The populace just don't see the need to make the shift. "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!" seems to be the mood.
Being a huge fan of Terry Pratchett's Discworld books, I couldn't help draw similarities with the Kingdom of Bhutan and the fictional Kingdom of Lancre. Both are mountainous backwaters that are blessed by young, recently enthroned, progressive-thinking kings. Like real world King Jigme Khesar, Lancre's King Verence II introduced a parliament to his fiefdom among his many reforms, thinking it a marvelous idea. The result? Having to quell a small rebellion by the villagers who protested that it's his job to rule!
Democracy? Pah! Go back to your palace Kingy and get back to reigning! The nerve of some people! :D
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Love the new layout.
I be pimpin' mah blog somethin' wikkid!
democracy is overrated. its being flagged as "the thing to have" to have a just society, but its all crap. it just pits everyone against everyone else.
wow. terry pratchet; i used to read his discworld books back in the mid-ninties... you just brought some wierd ass flashbacks to me.
and yes. kickass flag.
Post a Comment